Penal Code § 654 PC is the California statute that prohibits two or more punishments for the same criminal act or omission. The language of the statute reads that:
654. (a) An act or omission that is punishable in different ways by different provisions of law shall be punished under the provision that provides for the longest potential term of imprisonment, but in no case shall the act or omission be punished under more than one provision. An acquittal or conviction and sentence under any one bars a prosecution for the same act or omission under any other.
(b) Notwithstanding subdivision (a), a defendant sentenced pursuant to subdivision (a) shall not be granted probation if any of the provisions that would otherwise apply to the defendant prohibits the granting of probation.
An example of this situation is:
Lisa commits both trespass (under PC 602) and petty theft (under PC 484) when she sneaks into her neighbor’s home and takes his watch. In this situation, although Lisa committed two crimes, and may be charged and convicted of both, she can only be punished for the trespass or the petty theft (whichever has the longest term of imprisonment in the county jail).
California courts have adopted the “transaction test” to help determine whether multiple crimes are the result of “one act” or more than one act. This test focuses on your:
- intent, and
- objective.
The ban on multiple punishments for the same offense is one concept within “double jeopardy” under California criminal law. The Double Jeopardy Clause has been written into the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution (and into Penal Code 687). This clause guarantees that there will be:
- no multiple punishments for the same offense (as within PC 654),
- no prosecution after acquittal for the same offense, and
- no double convictions for the same offense.
Please note that if you commit a certain act that leads to two crimes, then you may be charged with both crimes in a single case or California jury trial. This is done via the legal process of “joinder.” Prosecutors may join related offenses into one case no matter whether they are:
- felonies, or
- misdemeanors.
Our California criminal defense attorneys will address the following in this article:
- 1. Multiple Punishments
- 2. Transaction Test
- 3. Double Jeopardy
- 4. Asserting Double Jeopardy
- 5. Joinder
PC 654 says that, while you may be charged and convicted for more than one crime, you can only be punished for one.
1. Multiple Punishments
Penal Code 654 PC applies to the situation when you commit one act that leads to more than one criminal charge. In this situation, PC 654 says that, while you may be charged and convicted for more than one crime, you can only be punished for one (and that one is the offense with the longest potential term of imprisonment).1
Consider, for example, the situation where Jose commits burglary (under PC 459) when he enters his ex-girlfriend’s home with the intent to steal one of her paintings. He then steals the painting, which is the crime of petty theft (under PC 484).
In this example, while Jose commits the single act of breaking into his ex-girlfriend’s home and stealing the painting, he commits two crimes. While he can be charged and convicted of both, Penal Code 654 says that he can only be punished with one. Plus, the one he can be punished with is that offense which has the longest jail term.
If it is determined that you committed multiple crimes, and those resulted from more than one act, then you may be punished with each individual offense.
2. Transaction Test
California courts have adopted the “transaction test” to help determine whether multiple crimes are the result of “one act” or more than one act.2
Under this test, multiple crimes are committed within one act if they are all part of the same transaction.3 In using this test, courts often consider your:
- intent, and
- objective.
As stated by one court:
“Whether a course of criminal conduct is divisible and therefore gives rise to more than one act within the meaning of section 654 depends on the intent and objective of the actor. If all of the offenses were incident to one objective, the defendant may be punished for any of such offenses but not for more than one.”4
California courts use the “transaction test” to determine whether multiple crimes are the result of “one act” or more than one act.
3. Double Jeopardy
Penal Code 654’s ban on multiple punishments for the same offense is one concept within “double jeopardy” under California law.
The Double Jeopardy Clause has been written into the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution.5 This clause guarantees that there will be:
- no prosecution after acquittal for the same offense,
- no double convictions for the same offense, and
- no multiple punishments for the same offense.6
The double jeopardy clause of the United States Constitution has also been adopted into California state law through California Penal Code 687.7
4. Asserting Double Jeopardy
After certain junctures in the criminal court process, the government loses its power to re-prosecute you for the same offense. When this happens, the law says that you
- were already “once in jeopardy” or
- that “jeopardy attaches.“
Below are the most common instances where jeopardy has attached and therefore the defense of double jeopardy applies:
- you were previously placed on trial for the same offense,
- you were acquitted of the same offense,
- a case against you was dismissed based on the merits of the charge,
- when a misdemeanor charge is involved and the prosecutor fails to bring the case to trial in a timely manner,
- you were convicted of the same offense, and
- you entered into a prior plea deal that involved the same charge.
5. Joinder
If you commit a certain act that leads to multiple crimes, then you may be charged with all the offenses in a single case or California jury trial. This is done via the legal process of joinder.
Prosecutors may join two or more offenses in the same case if either:
- the offenses are based on the same act or transaction,
- the offenses are based on two or more acts or transactions connected together,
- the offenses constitute a common scheme or plan.
In short, the D.A. does not have to bring a separate case for each separate offense if those offenses are sufficiently related.
Please note that prosecutors may join related offenses into one case no matter whether they are felonies or misdemeanors.
Prosecutors often make their joinder decision at the beginning of a case before the California arraignment.
Legal References:
- California Penal Code 654 PC. See, for example, People v. Ratcliff (Cal. App. 4th Dist., 1990), 223 Cal. App. 3d 1401; People v. Latten (Cal. App. 3d Dist. 2021) 63 Cal. App. 5th 574.
- See People v. Logan (1953), 41 Cal.2d 279.
- See same.
- Neal v. State of California (1960), 55 Cal.2d 11.
- U.S. Const. amend. V.
- See same.
- California Penal Code 687 PC.