California Penal Code § 211 PC prohibits robbery, which is “the felonious taking of personal property in the possession of another, from his person or immediate presence, and against his will, accomplished by means of force or fear.” Robbery is a felony punishable by up to 9 years in state prison.
Examples
- Holding up a cashier with a gun.
- Breaking into a house and threatening the residents with a knife before stealing their TV.
- Drugging someone and stealing their possessions while they are unconscious.
- After being caught stealing, threatening the owner with physical harm in order to escape.
Penalties
The following chart outlines the potential punishments of a PC 211 conviction.
Type of Robbery in California | Felony Sentence |
First-degree robbery, which is robbery of:
|
However, first-degree robbery in an inhabited structure in concert with two or more other people carries 3, 6, or 9 years in state prison. |
Second-degree robbery, which is all other types of robbery |
|
Robbery is often abbreviated as PC 211, 211 PC or 211 CPC – which are short for the California Penal Code. The crime is also referred to as Police Code 211.
To help you better understand the crime of robbery, our California criminal defense attorneys will address the following:
1. Elements
The elements of robbery are spelled out in California Jury Instruction “CALCRIM” 1600. For you to be convicted of robbery, prosecutors must prove beyond a reasonable doubt the following six elements:
- You took property that was not your own;
- The property was in the possession of another person;
- You took the property from the other person or their immediate presence;
- You took the property against that person’s will;
- You used fear or force to take the property or prevent the other person from resisting; and
- When you used fear or force to take the property, you intended to deprive the owner of it either permanently or for a long enough time to deprive them of a major portion of its value.1
Let’s take a closer look at some of these terms.
Taking Property
You “take” someone else’s property when you both:
- gain possession of it, and
- move it some distance—even a very short distance.2
In the Possession of Another Person
“Possession” does not have to mean holding or touching property. It is enough to have control over it or the right to control it (“constructive possession”).3
Also, the victim does not have to own the property that is stolen—they need only to possess it.4 For example, a store clerk or other business employee is considered to have possession of the inventory.5
From the Other Person or their Immediate Presence
A robbery occurs only if the defendant takes the property directly from the victim or their “immediate presence.”6
Property is considered to be in a person’s “immediate presence” if it is within their physical control, such that they would have been able to keep possession of it if the robbery had not occurred.7
Example: Bill confronts Victor outside of Victor’s home, which is several miles away from Victor’s jewelry store. Bill threatens to shoot Victor unless he tells him the combination to a safe at the jewelry store.
Victor tells Bill the combination, and Bill then calls his friend Andrea, who is at the jewelry store. She uses the combination to open the safe and steal jewelry.
Here, Bill and Andrea are innocent of robbery because they did not take the property from Victor’s immediate presence. Instead, they are guilty of grand theft and assault.8
Against the Property Owner’s Will
You are considered to have taken property against the owner’s will if they do not consent to you taking it. Consent must be given freely by someone who understands what they are doing.9
So, for example, if you threaten a person with a gun and they run away—and you then take their property that they left behind—you have committed robbery. You took their property without consent, even though they did not know you were doing so.
Use of Force or Fear
Robbery is distinguished from other California theft crimes by the fact that robbery always involves the use of “force or fear.”10
Force means physical force. According to Penal Code 212 PC, fear means fear of injury, to either:
- the victim themself,
- a family member of the victim,
- the victim’s property, or
- someone else present during the incident.11
Interestingly, California courts have held that force or fear is used—and a robbery is deemed to have occurred—if the defendant drugs the victim and then takes their property.12
Example: Doug meets Christine in a bar, and she invites him back to her house for coffee. Doug then slips a sedative into Christine’s coffee. After she passes out, he searches her house for money and valuables and then leaves with these.
Doug is guilty of robbery even though his drugging of Christine was an unusual form of “force or fear.”13
However, the slight, harmless touching that occurs when a pickpocket takes something off of someone’s person does NOT count as “force or fear.” So a pickpocket would not be guilty of robbery but rather grand theft.14
Intent to Deprive the Owner of the Property
Finally, robbery is a specific intent crime. This means you only commit the crime if—at the time the robbery occurred—you intended to deprive the victim of their property, either:
- permanently, or
- for a long enough period of time that the owner would be deprived of a major portion of its value or enjoyment.15
2. Penalties
California’s penalties for robbery – which are outlined in Penal Code 213 PC – depend on whether it is classified as “first-degree” or “second-degree.”16
First-Degree Robbery
California robbery in the first degree is when any of the following is true:
- The victim is a driver or passenger of a bus, taxi, cable car, streetcar, trackless trolley, subway, or other similar transportation for hire;
- The robbery takes place in an inhabited house, boat, or trailer; or
- The robbery takes place while or immediately after the victim uses an ATM.17
A house or structure is “inhabited” if someone lives there and either is present, or has left but intends to return.18
First-degree robbery in California is punished as a felony, carrying:
- felony (formal) probation;
- 3, 4, or 6 years in state prison; and/or
- up to $10,000.19
However, if you commit first-degree robbery in an inhabited structure in concert with two or more other people, then the prison sentence increases to three, six, or nine years.20
Second-Degree Robbery
California robbery in the second degree is any robbery that does not meet the definition of first-degree robbery.21
Also a felony, second-degree robbery carries:
- felony probation;
- 2, 3, or 5 years in state prison; and/or
- a fine of up to $10,000.22
Robbery with Multiple Victims
A count of robbery is determined by how many victims there are—NOT how many items of property you take.23
So if you apply force or fear to two people in order to steal the wallet of one of them, you will be charged with two counts of robbery.
However, if you steal multiple items of property from one person (for example, a piece of jewelry AND a cell phone), you will only be charged with one count of robbery.
Sentence Enhancements
In addition to the above penalties, there are various sentence enhancements that may add to the consequences of a Penal Code 211 conviction. These include the following
Penal Code 12022.7 PC – Great Bodily Injury
If, while committing a robbery, you cause another person to suffer a “great bodily injury” (defined as a substantial physical injury), then you could be subject to California’s great bodily injury enhancement.24
This sentencing enhancement can add an additional three to six years to your robbery sentence.25
Penal Code 12022.53 PC – “10-20-Life Use a Gun and You’re Done”
California’s “10-20-life use a gun and you’re done” law provides for significantly longer sentences for defendants who use a gun in the commission of a robbery.26
Specifically, you receive an extra:
- 10 years for personally using a firearm in a robbery;
- 20 years for personally and intentionally firing a gun during a robbery; and
- 25 years to life if you cause a person great bodily injury or death with a firearm during a robbery.27
California’s Three Strikes Law
Robbery is considered a violent felony and therefore a “strike offense” under California’s “three strikes” law.28
This means that if you have a robbery conviction and are subsequently charged with any California felony, you will face twice the normal sentence for that felony.29
Then if you accumulate three “strike” convictions—one or more of which may be a robbery conviction—then you will receive a sentence of 25 years to life in state prison.30
3. Defenses
Here at Shouse Law Group, we have represented literally thousands of people charged with robbery. In our experience, the following four defenses have proven very effective with judges, juries, and prosecutors at having these charges reduced or dismissed in the pretrial process.
You Did Not Use Force or Fear to Take the Property
According to Riverside criminal defense attorney Michael Scafiddi:31
“The use of ‘force or fear’ is probably the key element distinguishing robbery from other California theft crimes. If the prosecutors cannot prove this element, then robbery charges cannot stick. The defendant may still be convicted of another theft crime—but the others usually carry lesser penalties and less stigma than robbery.”
Just become someone was intimidated by you does not mean you used force or fear to take their property. In cases where there is no video or eyewitness evidence, prosecutors will have a hard time proving you used force or fear to take property.
You Honestly Believed You Had a Right to the Property
If you rob someone because you honestly believe the property you are taking belongs to you, then California law excuses the robbery. This is known as the “claim of right” defense.32
The claim of right defense applies even if your belief that you have a right to the property is mistaken or unreasonable.33 However, it does not apply to robberies that are committed for the purposed of settling debts.34
Example: Hal gives his wife $200 to pay some bills. Then when he realizes his wife plans to give the money to her mother, he demands it back. She puts the cash in her bra, and Hal wrestles her to get the money.
Hal may not be guilty of robbery even though he used force to take money from his wife. This is because he believed that he had a right to take the money back from her.35
You Are a Victim of Mistaken Identity
Robbery defendants are often charged after the victim identifies them in a pretrial lineup—a process that leads to many mistakes and false accusations.
In many other robbery cases, the perpetrator was wearing a mask or other disguise—which means that a defendant is identified based on:
- clothes,
- height/weight, or
- other flimsy pieces of evidence.
We know how to evaluate the prosecution’s case to see if it is based on unreliable circumstantial evidence. We can fight the charges by pointing out the holes in the state’s evidence and reminding the jury that they may not convict unless they are 100% certain they have the right man or woman.
You Were Falsely Accused
Someone might falsely accuse you of robbery for any number of reasons. Maybe the actual perpetrator is trying to cover up their own guilt. Maybe an angry or jealous ex-spouse is trying to gain control over you.
This is another situation where we would need to conduct a thorough investigation into the facts of what actually occurred.
4. Related Offenses
- Penal Code 207 PC – kidnapping
- Penal Code 215 PC – carjacking
- Penal Code 487 PC – grand theft
- Penal Code 488 PC – petty theft
- Penal Code 459.5 PC – shoplifting
- Penal Code 518 PC – extortion
Victim Resources
- The California Victim Compensation Program – state program that provides financial compensation to eligible victims of violent crimes in California.
- VINElink – National Victim Notification Network, provides victims of crime access to current information regarding offenders and resources.
- California Attorney General’s Victim’s Services Unit – state division that provides support, resources, and advocacy for crime victims and their families throughout California’s criminal justice process.
Legal References:
- Judicial Council of California Criminal Jury Instructions (“CALCRIM”) 1600 (“The defendant is charged with robbery [in violation of Penal Code section 211]. To prove that the defendant is guilty of this crime, the People must prove that: 1 The defendant took property that was not (his/her) own; 2 The property was in the possession of another person; 3 The property was taken from the other person or (his/her) immediate presence; 4 The property was taken against that person’s will; 5 The defendant used force or fear to take the property or to prevent the person from resisting; AND 6 When the defendant used force or fear to take the property, (he/she) intended (to deprive the owner of it permanently/ [or] to remove it from the owner’s possession for so extended a period of time that the owner would be deprived of a major portion of the value or enjoyment of the property).”). Penal Code 211 PC – Definition. (“Robbery is the felonious taking of personal property in the possession of another, from his person or immediate presence, and against his will, accomplished by means of force or fear.”) Penal Code 213 PC – Robbery; punishment. (“(1) Robbery of the first degree is punishable as follows: (A) If the defendant, voluntarily acting in concert with two or more other persons, commits the robbery within an inhabited dwelling house, a vessel as defined in Section 21 of the Harbors and Navigation Code, which is inhabited and designed for habitation, an inhabited floating home as defined in subdivision (d) of Section 18075.55 of the Health and Safety Code, a trailer coach as defined in the Vehicle Code, which is inhabited, or the inhabited portion of any other building, by imprisonment in the state prison for three, six, or nine years. (B) In all cases other than that specified in subparagraph (A), by imprisonment in the state prison for three, four, or six years. (2) Robbery of the second degree is punishable by imprisonment in the state prison for two, three, or five years. (b) Notwithstanding Section 664, attempted robbery in violation of paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) is punishable by imprisonment in the state prison.”). See also People v. Burgos (Cal. App. 6th Dist. 2022) 77 Cal. App. 5th 550; People v. Gefrerer (2024) No. D082223 (Cal. Ct. App. Jun. 6, 2024); People v. Avery (2002) 27 Cal.4th 49; People v. Anderson (1966) 64 Cal.2d 633; People v. Mungia (1991) 234 Cal.App.3d 1703; People v. Estes (1983) 147 Cal.App.3d 23; People v. Collins (2021) 65 Cal.App.5th 333; People v. Cuevas (2001) 89 Cal.App.4th 689; People v. Hayes (1990) 52 Cal.3d 577; People v. Green (1980) 27 Cal.3d 1; People v. Hall (1986) 41 Cal.3d 826; Rodriguez v. Superior Court (1984) 159 Cal.App.3d 821; People v. Avery (2002) 27 Cal.4th 49; People v. Zangari (2001) 89 Cal.App.4th 1436; People v. Bekele (1995) 33 Cal.App.4th 1457; People v. Rodriguez (1999) 20 Cal.4th 1; People v. Frazer (2003) 106 Cal.App.4th 1105; People v. Gilbeaux (2003) 111 Cal.App.4th 515; People v. Scott (2009) 45 Cal.4th 743; People v. Gilbeaux (2003) 111 Cal.App.4th 515; People v. Weddles (2010) 184 Cal.App.4th 1365; People v. Williams (2013) 57 Cal.4th 776; People v. Mullins (2018) 19 Cal.App.5th 594; People v. McElheny (1982) 137 Cal.App.3d 396; People v. Pitmon (1985) 170 Cal.App.3d 38; People v. Bekele (1995) 33 Cal.App.4th 1457; People v. Rodriguez (1999) 20 Cal.4th 1; People v. Nguyen (2000) 24 Cal.4th 756; People v. Mai (1994) 22 Cal.App.4th 117; People v. Webster (1991) 54 Cal.3d 411; People v. Ortega (1998) 19 Cal.4th 686; People v. Cooksey (2002) 95 Cal.App.4th 1407; People v. Gamble (1994) 22 Cal.App.4th 446; People v. Escobar (1996) 45 Cal.App.4th 477; People v. Covington (1934) 1 Cal.2d 316; People v. Villa (2007) 157 Cal.App.4th 1429; People v. Bradford (1997) 14 Cal.4th 1005; People v. Ramkeesoon (1985) 39 Cal.3d 346; People v. Reed (2000) 78 Cal.App.4th 274; People v. Simmons (1946) 28 Cal.2d 699; People v. Thomas (1941) 45 Cal.App.2d 128; People v. Green (1980) 27 Cal.3d 1; People v. Hall (1986) 41 Cal.3d 826.
- CALCRIM 1600 (“[A person takes something when he or she gains possession of it and moves it some distance. The distance moved may be short.]”). People v. Martinez (1969) 274 Cal.App.2d 170; People v. Price (1972) 25 Cal.App.3d 576.
- CALCRIM 1600 (“[A person does not have to actually hold or touch something to possess it. It is enough if the person has (control over it/ [or] the right to control it), either personally or through another person.] [A (store/ [or] business) (employee/ <insert description>) who is on duty has possession of the (store/ [or] business) owner’s property.]”)
- See same. See also Based on the facts of People v. Bekele (1995) 33 Cal.App.4th 1457 (disapproved on other grounds by People v. Rodriguez (1999) 20 Cal.4th 1).
- Same.
- CALCRIM 1600 endnote 1, above. People v. Harris (1994) 9 Cal.4th 407; People v. Prieto (1993) 15 Cal.App.4th 210; People v. Webster (1991) 54 Cal.3d 411; People v. Dominguez (1992) 11 Cal.App.4th 1342.
- CALCRIM 1600 (“[Property is within a person’s immediate presence if it is sufficiently within his or her physical control that he or she could keep possession of it if not prevented by force or fear.]”)
- People v. Hayes (1990) 52 Cal.3d 577, 627. (“A taking can be accomplished by force or fear and yet not be from the victim’s immediate presence. For example, a person might enter the victim’s home and there, by the use of force or fear, compel the victim to reveal the combination of a safe located many miles away in the victim’s office. The culprit at the victim’s house could then relay the combination to a confederate waiting in or near the office, who could use it to open the safe and take its contents before the victim could reach the office or otherwise interfere with the taking. In such a case, the criminals would have accomplished the taking by force or fear and yet not have taken property from the person or immediate presence of the victim. The perpetrators of the taking would be guilty of several offenses-conspiracy, burglary, assault, and grand theft at the least-but they would not be guilty of robbery as defined in [Penal Code] section 211 because the taking would not be from an area over which the victim, at the time force or fear was employed, could be said to exercise some physical control.”)
- CALCRIM 1600 (“[An act is done against a person’s will if that person does not consent to the act. In order to consent, a person must act freely and voluntarily and know the nature of the act.]”)
- CALCRIM 1600 endnote 1, above. People v. Davison (1995) 32 Cal.App.4th 206; People v. Renteria (1964) 61 Cal.2d 497; People v. Collins (2021) 65 Cal.App.5th 333; People v. Garcia (1996) 45 Cal.App.4th 1242; People v. Mosby (2004) 33 Cal.4th 353; People v. Dreas (1984) 153 Cal.App.3d 623; People v. Wright (1996) 52 Cal.App.4th 203; People v. Cooper (1991) 53 Cal.3d 1158; People v. Pham (1993) 15 Cal.App.4th 61; People v. Estes (1983) 147 Cal.App.3d 23.
- Penal Code 212 PC – Fear defined. (“The fear mentioned in Section 211 may be either: 1. The fear of an unlawful injury to the person or property of the person robbed, or of any relative of his or member of his family; or, 2. The fear of an immediate and unlawful injury to the person or property of anyone in the company of the person robbed at the time of the robbery.”)See also CALCRIM 1600 (“[Fear, as used here, means fear of (injury to the person himself or herself[,]/ [or] injury to the person’s family or property[,]/ [or] immediate injury to someone else present during the incident or to that person’s property).]”)
- People v. Dreas, supra at 627. (“As stated above, the appellant was found guilty of three counts of robbery. These convictions were predicated on evidence showing that in each instance appellant used Lorazepam, a tranquilizer, dissolved in hot coffee in order to drug his victims. The drug rendered the victims unconscious, overcoming their resistance to the taking of various items of personal property from their homes or persons. Appellant contends that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the robbery convictions because the use of drugs does not constitute “means of force or fear” within the meaning of [Penal Code] section 211 [California’s robbery law]. We disagree.”)
- Based on the facts of the same.
- CALCRIM 1600 Related Issues: Force – Amount. (“The force required for robbery must be more than the incidental touching necessary to take the property. (People v. Garcia (1996) 45 Cal.App.4th 1242, 1246 (noting that the force employed by a pickpocket would be insufficient), disapproved on other grounds in People v. Mosby (2004) 33 Cal.4th 353, 365, fns. 2, 3 [92 P.3d 841].)”)
- CALCRIM 1600 endnote 1, above.
- Penal Code 213 PC – Robbery; punishment, endnote 1, above.
- Penal Code 212.5 PC – Robbery; degrees. See also CALCRIM 1602 – Robbery: Degrees (Pen. Code, § 212.5). (“To prove that the defendant is guilty of first degree robbery, the People must prove that: [The robbery was committed in an inhabited (dwelling/vessel/floating home/trailer coach/part of a building). A (dwelling/vessel/floating home/trailer coach/part of a building) is inhabited if someone lives there and either is present or has left but intends to return.] [The robbery was committed while the person robbed was using or had just used an ATM machine and was still near the machine.] [The robbery was committed while the person robbed was performing (his/her) duties as the driver of or was a passenger on (a/an) (bus/taxi/cable car/streetcar/trackless trolley/ <other kind of vehicle used to transport people.>.]”)
- See same.
- Penal Code 213 PC – Robbery; punishment, endnote 1, above. See also Penal Code 672 PC – Fines not otherwise prescribed.
- Penal Code 213 PC – Robbery; punishment, endnote 1, above.
- Penal Code 212.5 – Robbery; degrees,.
- Penal Code 213 PC – Robbery; punishment, endnote 1, above. See also Penal Code 672 PC – Fines not otherwise prescribed.
- People v. Ramos (1982) 30 Cal.3d 553, 589 (overruled on other grounds). (“We view the central element of the crime of robbery as the force or fear applied to the individual victim in order to deprive him of his property. Accordingly, if force or fear is applied to two victims in joint possession of property, two convictions of robbery are proper.”). People v. Ramos (1982) 30 Cal.3d 553; California v. Ramos (1983) 463 U.S. 992; People v. Miles (1996) 43 Cal.App.4th 364; People v. Brito (1991) 232 Cal.App.3d 316.
- Penal Code 12022.7 PC
- See same.
- Penal Code 12022.53 PC – California’s 10-20-life “use a gun and you’re done” law.
- See same.
- Penal Code 667.5 PC – Violent felonies.
- Penal Code 667(e)(1) PC – Three strikes law.
- See same.
- Riverside criminal defense attorney Michael Scaffidi is a former law enforcement officer. He now uses that inside knowledge to help defend clients accused of California theft crimes, including robbery, as well as other criminal charges in San Bernardino and Riverside Counties. Scafiddi routinely makes appearances at the Murrieta Southwest Justice Center and in Fontana, Banning, Barstow, Palm Springs, and Joshua Tree.
- CALCRIM 1600 – Robbery (Pen. Code, § 211), Related Issues: Claim of Right. (“If a person honestly believes that he or she has a right to the property even if that belief is mistaken or unreasonable, such belief is a defense to robbery. See CALCRIM No. 1863, Defense to Theft or Robbery: Claim of Right.) This defense is only available for robberies when a specific piece of property is reclaimed; it is not a defense to robberies perpetrated to settle a debt, liquidated or unliquidated. People v. Butler (1967) 65 Cal.2d 569; People v. Romo (1990) 220 Cal.App.3d 514; People v. Tufunga (1999) 21 Cal.4th 935.
- See same.
- See same.
- Based on the facts of People v. Tufunga (1999) 221 Cal.4th 935.